I just heard on the news that the 3rd Al Queda biggie was killed, giving the U.S. the edge on that murky shapeless war on terror we have been officially waging since 2001.
While I am happy to hear these news, I think that even we were to win the 4 wars (1.this “war on terror”; 2. in Afghanistan; 3. in Iraq; 4. in Lybia), we’ve been waging since the fateful 2001 (and I am not counting the “war on drugs”), we are heading to lose our way of life.
It’s not the democracy I am worried about here, but material comfort and relative peace on the streets (outside of occasional shootings and muggings).
It appears that there has been another war waging, and it is on American economy.
It’s beginnings are murky. But I would trace it as far back as Reagan’s Administration, that first began an unofficial war on unions. Unions make labor-intensive manufacturing very expensive and eat into profits of investors.
Well, nobody likes unions (except for unions’ bosses), so what’s the big deal?
The big deal is that everybody likes the middle class.
The middle class is as essential to any economy, as an engine to a car. Without it, economy is dead.
Even if we were to end up with a few thousands of super rich dudes, while the rest of us would struggle to survive (i.e. the middle class would disappear completely), all the many billions of these super rich would not create the job growth a multi-million population requires. They would invest into emerging markets, not the dying ones.
Why would they create a factory of any kind in the U.S., where people are struggling to stretch a dollar to pay rent, bills and buy groceries and their discretional income is so tight that all they can afford is cheap Chinese goods in Walmart, when these super rich investors can build a factory in Brazil, or India, or same China, where people are eager to spend their increasing earnings?
By the way, is not it one of the main reasons, that the numbers of unemployed right now stay where they are despite us giving continuous tax breaks to these super rich?
Yes, the second attack on American economy began during the prosperous 1990s, when Clinton Administration signed away any kind of protection of American labor force, and internet was born (internet makes outsourcing a breeze).
Suddenly, American labor force had to compete with the labor force of other countries, and American people could no longer ask for wage increase, because the majority of the world’s labor force was so much cheaper and just as good.
It took about 10 years for Americans to notice that their incomes were stagnating while their bills grew. They kept waiting for their personal prosperity to come, while changing jobs, professions and investing into 401K and increasingly expensive real estate.
But Clinton Administration also approved the deregulation of financial markets.
Suddenly, the credit was so cheap and so available, that the American people have not noticed that their actual discretional income was dwindling to nothing.
Why worry, if one could still buy a McMansion, and buy even more stuff by turning the McMansion into an ATM machine?
Yes, 1990s were prosperous. The economy was booming as people were eager consumers. The problem was that everything was bought on credit rather then with actual money.
Everyone was expecting the actual income to catch up, as it used to.
But it did not, because so many jobs have either left the country or paid as much as in other (read CHEAPER) countries.
Eventually, the credit bubble had to burst, and it did in 2008.
If the federal government did not pump money into the banks that lost the money by lending it to population so indiscriminately, The economy would have simply collapse like it did in Argentina in 1990s.
Americans were saved, although suddenly they came face to face with their economic reality and realized they were so much poorer than a decade ago.
So many of them have lost their job, that those who did not no longer dared to ask for a wage increase or benefits or union perks. In fact, they started giving up their last benefits and perks just so they could keep a job.
And that is when the final attack on American economy began.
Since it was now the federal government that was pulling the economy down the road as its engine, the middle class, stalled, the enemies in our midst began to attack the federal government.
The ideas Obama put on the table were nothing short of brilliant: invest federal dollars into aging crumbling infrastructure and green economy – labor-intensive enterprises that must hire domestic labor force. Every created job would spur on 10s of other jobs, and the economy would begin humming again.
But the enemies in our midst thought otherwise. Suddenly, federal deficit began to be used as a panic-inspiring weapon of choice.
Of course, the surplus that Clinton Administration left the country with would have been a much better deal. But if credit is sparse everywhere else, how else would you come up with money needed to pump the economy?
The enemies in our midst said, “Let starve the federal government of tax income, let’s keep taxes low so the few super rich would invest their money into economy. The government is too big and lives beyond its means. Its deficit is going to bankrupt our children”.
Americans love their children, so anything threatening the kids works as a great scarecrow.
They are also badly educated (read my American Education Reform ).
So Obama’s proposals were decimated, the government began shedding its work force, unemployment came back to its pick numbers, and unions everywhere lost their power and benefits.
Now there is no one to pull our economy from the brink. Those who are employed, work at REDUCED wages, that are getting closer to the 3rd world range.
Meanwhile, every single life staple, like groceries, rent, cable bills, insurance, etc. doubled or more in price (as compared to 10 yrs ago or less). Even those who work at median salaries have less money to buy desirable but unnecessary things.
This means that businesses producing and selling anything that is not a life staple make less profit so they begin to shed their labor force.
The less there is labor force, the less income the government gets. Since deficit is now a dirty word, the government has no choice but shed its work force and cut services to the impoverished population.
Now the time came to put the final nails into the coffin of what used to be the largest world economy: refuse to raise the ceiling on federal credit.
Once the federal government loses its credit-worthiness, watch American economy collapse into THE GREATER THAN THE GREAT DEPRESSION ditch.
The idiot dream of labor-intensive manufacturers like Koch brothers would come true:
labor in America would become as cheap as in Africa.
Unfortunately, the American workers would no longer be able to afford using the toilet paper they manufacture for Koch brothers. Like their African brethren, they would have to use tree leaves to wipe their asses. So Koch brothers would eventually go broke too.
No, it is not the federal deficit that threatens the future of our children. It is our inability to discern the enemies in our midst.
As for the scary federal deficit, it was Reagan administration that first racked it up into the trillions. Then Bush administration turned the surplus into another multi-trillion dollar debt. No one screamed of deficit while republicans were in power. The congress did not attack neither of the republican presidents for taking us into expensive wars (Reagan’s Panama blitz, Nicaragua fiasco, etc.; Bush’s Afghanistan, Iraq and the amorphous war on terror).
No, I am not happy at all with Lybia war either. I just don’t think it matters much anymore.
Like I predicted in 2008, “FINANCIAL CRISIS – IT’S NOT OVER UNTIL IT’S OVER”
Archive for the ‘education reform’ Category
THE ENEMIES IN OUR MIDST OR HOW TO KILL THE WORLD’S LARGEST ECONOMY
Posted by Ella Moss on June 11, 2011
Posted in American economy, economy, education, education reform, FINANCES, global economy, labor market, opinion, personal finance, politics, predictions, Uncategorized | Tagged: Al Queda, Bush, deficit, economy, financial crisis, global economy, great depression, India, Iraq, money, news, Obama, outsourcing, politics, predictions, Reagan, recession, taxes, unemployment, war, worry | 4 Comments »
AMERICAN EDUCATION REFORM
Posted by Ella Moss on October 5, 2010
I went to a regular public school in Leningrad (now St. Petersburg), Russia. Like all Russian kids, I started school at 7 years of age.
That is the good age to start school, because a typical child should already develop abstract thinking by that time, so learning math is easier.
Since I became an avid reader at the age of 4, I soon became bored at t school. Unlike me, most of the kids were still learning to read.
I found a way to while my time by reading books under the table. Once I was caught and got “F”.
But, by the second semester, studying has already caught my interest.
In the elementary school (Russian grades 1 – 3), the emphasis was on handwriting and arithmetic. Not even grown-ups had calculators, let alone computers, so we were learning to use our minds and had to develop good memory skills. AND NO ONE COULD WRITE USING PENCILS. We actually had to use liquid ink – remember that one:)?
We would spend only 4 hours in school (from 9am to 1pm), and typical homework time increased to 1 hour by the 3rd grade.
The rest of the time we spent being kids: playing, attending extra-curriculum activities (mine was ballet).
We did not need babysitters, even though our parents were at work for most of the day, because,
1) by 7 years of age we already knew how to warm up dinner
2) senior citizens sitting on a bench (and those were everywhere) SUPERVISED us. Raising kids was everybody’s job (IT DOES TAKE A VILLAGE TO RAISE A KID), and all those grannies were taking it seriously. Many a times I would be called to a bench by such a granny, and she would painfully pinch my ear while reprimanding me.
I can only imagine what would happen to such granny here:).
At school, however, there was no corporal punishment of any sort, even though an average class size was 40.
The teacher would reprimand us by making us stand in the corner in front of the class and writing a note in our diaries in red.
Every kid had such a diary, where each teacher would mark a grade for each lesson and a grade for behavior. It was up to the parent to check the diary each day and, if necessary, apply corporal punishment (although excessive corporal punishment would have consequences for the parent). I don’t remember any child coming to school with bruises left by an irate parent.
Each lesson in school (all the way through high-school) would be 45 minutes long, and then we would have 15 minutes recess, with a lunch recess lasting 20 minutes. Recess was our time to socialize, and we did it with vigor.
In middle school (Russian grades 4 – 8), the school day lasted 9am to 3 pm, and we had separate teachers for each subject.
My math teacher disliked me immensely as I was a rowdy kid, and would lower my grade no matter what, so I stopped paying attention to math, even though I showed promise before, even winning a city-wide competition in math in the 4th grade.
I continued to do well in the subjects taught by teachers who encouraged me or were able to arouse my interest.
Like everywhere, we had good and bad teachers.
BUT CURRICULUM WAS THE SAME IN THE WHOLE COUNTRY. So students transferring to different schools were basically on the same level.
Exceptions were specialized schools (mostly bilingual). But most people could not even dream of placing their child in such a school (one had to have connections).
High school (grades 9-10) was optional in Russia, and most of the kids who graduated middle school with mostly “C”s (like me) went straight to vocational schools.
I chose to go to high-school despite my failing grades. The vigorous curriculum there was even more difficult to deal with, because our minds were filled with girl-boy business. But I managed to graduate with “C” average nonetheless.
By that time I knew I was going to America, so I did not bother with trying to get into college in Russia. Besides, with grades like mine, my chances of higher education were virtually none.
But I managed to get into American college, even with practically no English.
My first semester there was tough: I had to translate virtually every word I read, so reading 1 page (and there would be 30 of those per subject) would take 30 minutes for me.
But by the second semester already I dropped ESL and began acing each subject, getting straight “A”s and being on the Dean’s list each semester.
College education in America was a breeze next to Russian school education! One semester I even took Calculus I, which was equivalent to the 5th grade algebra in Russian middle school, and got an easy “A”.
My last 2 years in college, I had a full-time job, a full-time boyfriend (we lived together), was taking 18 credits, having a major and a minor, and still was getting nothing but “A”s. BECAUSE IT WAS SO EASY!!!
I knew then that Russian (read European) education was by far more superior.
Now my kid is going to a public school in NYC, and it breaks my heart knowing that he is getting sub-par education – even though he is studying way too much and has started school way too early.
I did not know that I don’t have to send him to school the fall he turned 5. So he was still 4, when he started THE TORTURE.
He would say then, “Mommy, I don’t want to go to school. I want to play with cars”, and I would try hard not show him my tears as my heart was crying. He was so right! His childhood was cut short too early. And for what???
He is in the 5th grade now, still 9 years old. He is an “A” student, doing well in school and on state exams.
BUT HE STILL WRITES IN PENCIL, AND HIS HANDWRITING IS SO TERRIBLE THAT I DOUBT HIS TEACHER READS HIS HOMEWORK – I HAVE HARD TIME DOING THIS!
BUT THIS SUMMER I HAD TO GO OVER THE ARITHMETIC WITH HIM, BECAUSE THERE WERE SERIOUS HOLES IN HIS KNOWLEDGE.
Other kids in his school have either private math tutors or attend special math classes on Saturdays in nearby colleges.
Unfortunately, we have neither time nor money. He is in a professional
choir 3 times a week, and on weekends he has tennis, chess and piano lessons. Math he should be studying in school. Afterall, he is there 8Am – 3pm. What is he doing there these long 7 hours?
Plus, he has no less then 2.5 hours of homework every day.
That is 9.5 hours work day for a little 9 y.o. kid (and I am not even adding piano practice, as that is our choice).
Yet he knows much less than I did at that age.
Soon he is likely to be so tired from all this schooling that does not teach him much that I would have to count on his considerable ambition to carry him through the rest of his education.
But even if he gets into a choice IS public school (I cannot even afford a catholic school, let alone something else), I doubt his education would reach the level I’ve received in Soviet Russia.
So I am all for education reform in America.
But starting school at 2 y.o. or taking children’s summer (those short 2 months) away is not an answer.
By the way, in Russia, we had 3 months summer vacation and no extra tutoring of any sort. We rested. We had time for childhood.
And, as you can see from my story, we had huge class sizes and many bad teachers.
Yet, our education was by far more superior.
I credit the curriculum. That is what needs to be reformed. Afterall, it is not HOW our children learn, but WHAT they learn that ultimately determines WHAT THEY END UP KNOWING (which, in turn, determines the future of this country).
And NO ONE NEEDS TO INVENT SOMETHING NEW. Why not to borrow European curriculum and educational methods? Actually, Singapore curriculum is considered to be even better now. At least, many good Israely schools now teach that curriculum.
But, unfortunately for my kid and yours, that is just a wishful musing on my part….
Posted in education, education reform, Uncategorized | 17 Comments »



